EC Workforum on CRPD implementation 2016 - Reisverslag uit Brussel, België van Jolijn Santegoeds - EC Workforum on CRPD implementation 2016 - Reisverslag uit Brussel, België van Jolijn Santegoeds -

EC Workforum on CRPD implementation 2016

Door: Jolijn

Blijf op de hoogte en volg Jolijn

12 Juni 2016 | België, Brussel

On Thursday 9 June 2016 in the evening, I went to Brussels by train, to participate in the European Commission’s Work Forum on the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UN CRPD) in the EU and the Member States, which took place on Friday 10 June 2016 in Brussels. I spent the night at the First Euroflat Hotel, where I had been before (ENUSP Empowerment Seminar 2015). And in the morning I met quite some familiar European faces at the breakfast.

From 8 AM on the registration for the conference started in the Charlemagne building, and at 9 AM the opening started with a welcome word by Emmanuelle Grange.

The first speaker was Manuele Geleng, Acting Director of Social Affairs of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inlcusion, who spoke about several recent European developments, such as the adoption of the European Accessibility Act, the midterm review of the European Disability Strategy and the consultation on the European Pillar of Social Rights, which show that there is increased attention and cooperation on disability rights at the European level.

Then Geert-Jan Buisman of the Permanent Representation of the Netherlands to the EU, spoke on behalf of the Dutch Presidency of the EU, and he mentioned that it is expected that next week, on Tuesday (14 June), the Netherlands will submit the documents for the Dutch CRPD ratification to the UN Secretary General. That is wonderful news. Finally the Dutch ratification is about to happen. Mr. Buisman stated that the Netherlands had waited so long with the ratification, because they needed time to bring the national legislation in line with the international instruments.
(Personally I know that the Netherlands has made a range of interpretative declarations to the CRPD in order to avoid change, so the claimed Dutch compliance is not so really real, but in fact merely political smooth-talk, but nevertheless, the Dutch ratification of the UN CRPD is a great step forwards for the rights of persons with disabilities in the Netherlands. I was happy to hear the ratification date being mentioned, which coincides with the Conference of State Parties to the UN CRPD in New York next week - a coincidence?? – anyway, I am looking forward to it very much).

The third word of welcome was spoken by Yannis Vardakastanis, President of the European Disability Forum (EDF), who reflected on the long way of advocacy by disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) that has led to where we are now. All over Europe, and all over the world, efforts are being made to implement the rights of the UN CRPD, and since the Sustainable Development Goals are not very specific on the UN CRPD, a thorough development agenda for the rights of persons with disabilities is needed, for Europe, but also globally, which is a challenge ahead.

Then the first session started, which focussed on Human rights approach to disability, with 4 speakers and moderated by Ana Pelaez.
First Ana Sofia Antunes, Portugese Secretary of State of Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities, spoke about using a human rights approach for the recognition and assessment of disability, which is based on the identification of the real barriers for participation.

Then Charles O’Mahony of NUI Galway (School of Law) spoke about the impact of human rights based approach in Member States’ legislation on Legal Capacity. He explained the Irish law reform and the Irish Assisted Decision Making Act, where the focus has shifted from an incapacity approach that used to deny persons their legal capacity, to providing decision-making support services to enable persons to exercise their legal capacity. The new Irish Assisted Decision Making law doesn’t fully comply with the UN CRPD yet, because it still contains some elements of the old paradigm, but it is a significant improvement, and a great step forwards compared to the old system.

Begona Gosalbez Raull, Spanish Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality, spoke about aligning human rights agendas: for example of women and disability rights. 60% of persons with disabilities are women, and women with disabilities often face multiple and intersectional forms of discrimination, which needs to be recognized and remedied.

Hanna Ronty of the Finnish Human Rights Centre, spoke about National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) and their role and approach in implementing the CRPD. In 13 EU states, the NHRI has the role to monitor the UN CRPD implementation under article 33.2.

After the coffee break, the second session started, which was about Implementation of the CRPD through strategies, with 4 speakers and moderated by Catherine Naughton.

The first speaker was Helga Stevens, Member of the European Parliament. She spoke about the own initiative report that the European Parliament (EP) is preparing (Helga Stevens is the main author). The EP-report serves as an input for the upcoming follow-up report of the European Commission (EC) on the CRPD Concluding Observations to the EU. The EP report will be put to vote in Strasbourg in July.

Then Emmanuelle Grange, Head of Unit Disability and Inclusion of the European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion spoke about the midterm review process of the European Disability Strategy. The public consultation on the European Disability Strategy got a lot of input, about 1500 respondents, and about 2/3 of the respondents were persons with disabilities and their organizations (DPOs). The answers are now analysed by the EC and turned into proposals, which also have to be checked against the CRPD Concluding Observations (COs) and the EP-own initiative report. The European Disability Strategy was drafted prior to the EUs ratification of the UN CRPD and is therefore not covering all aspects, and could be improved. However, the European Disability Strategy runs till 2020, and with the midterm review, the strategy itself will not be changed, but the aim is to focus on the implementation of the existing strategy, to make it work. After 2020 a new strategy will be put in place, and we can start preparing for that future now already.

Then Wolfram Giese of the German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs spoke about the National CRPD Strategy in Germany. In 2015, Germany was reviewed by the UN CRPD Committee and received about 60 recommendations. There is a national focal point for implementation, but also all “lander” (districts or states within Germany) have a focal point. And all of them made a Disability Action Plan based on the Concluding Observations, and sensitive to the local and regional needs. These plans have been submitted for academic evaluation, and it showed there was a need for more emphasis on cross cutting issues, such as awareness and data collection. As a result, 175 new measures have been added to the National Action Plan, and also target have been added to the actions, and 12% of the added measures are related to crosscutting themes which involve different bodies and different levels. A lot of material from Germany is available in English as well.

Marily Christofy of the Greek National Confederation of Disabled People spoke about the involvement of disabled people’s organizations (DPOs) in developing, implementing and monitoring strategy. She spoke about the need for de-institutionalization, and that the European Social Funds (ESF) are a good motivator for change, since there are now “ex ante-conditions” that prohibit to spend European money on initiatives that violate the rights of persons with disabilities, such as institutions. The European Social Funds are provided to help States to fulfil the obligations under the UN CRPD. In Greece there is a working group to coordinate monitoring of the ex-ante conditions for the use of ESF funds.

During the time for debate, I asked Helga Stevens (EP) and Emmanuelle Grange (EC) what is being done in regards of the Guidelines on article 14, which is a significant attachment to the UN CRPD Concluding Observations which were issued to the EU.
The answers were not ambitious: it was said that the EU doesn’t have the competence to make legislation on Liberty, - since that competence is with the Member States- and so the EU “cannot do much” except encouraging and sharing information and good practices. The European Charter of Fundamental Rights is in line with the philosophy of article 14, and doesn’t allow for deprivation of liberty, and treatment against one’s will. The Member States have to implement this, and the EC can encourage, to ensure that the principle isn’t breached.
But I wasn’t really satisfied with that answer, - I just see it differently, since the constitution of the EU mentions a number of core values to be promoted and secured by the EU, including liberty, so it is in fact a duty of the EU to work on issues of liberty, justice, democracy, equality and so on. Helga Stevens then invited me for email communication on this theme.

And then it was lunch time, which lasted 1,5 hours, after which session 3 started on Implementation of CRPD: Social protection and adequate standard of living, moderated by Ima Placencie-Porrero.

Gabor Gombos, on behalf of the Hungarian National Disability Council, gave a very interesting presentation on CRPD article 28 on social protection and adequate standard of living, which is a very real issue in the lives of persons with disabilities. Gabor Gombos explained the normative content of social protection and an adequate standard of living. An adequate standard of living is relevant for all people, and relates for example to food, clothes, housing, continuous improvements of living conditions. The right to social protection relates for example to poverty reduction, and assistance in the form of covering disability related expenses. The distinction is not always clear.
State obligations regarding social, economic and cultural rights are subject to “progressive realization” (progressive in terms of resources) which means that States should use the maximum of available resources to realize these rights, and they should have a plan and a budget, and actions cannot be endlessly delayed , (also see the comments of ICESCR Committee, and the OPERA framework, which is a tool to monitor progressive realization). There should be no retrogression in social protection or standard of living, yet, the recent economic crisis has caused major budget cuts throughout all services, and this disproportionally affects persons with disabilities.
States have the duty to respect, protect and fulfil, which also includes that States should take effective measures in case of violations by non-state actors, such as private actors.
The jurisprudence of ICESCR shows that there is a certain minimum level for acceptable living standards and social protection, “no person will have to live an inhuman life”. This ‘social protection floor’ contains some core elements for a minimum standard of living, such as social benefits. Yet, while non-disabled people can use their benefits for participation and social inclusion, persons with disabilities have additional disability-related expenses, which puts them in a disadvantaged position when it comes to participation and inclusion. Therefore there is now a lot of discussion about a ‘social participation floor’ instead of a social protection floor.

Karina de Beule of the Vlaams Agentschap voor Personen met een Handicap (VAPH) spoke about the shift towards a personal financing system for support for persons with disabilities in Flanders. And to identify the amount of the personal assistance budget, the barriers for participation are identified, as well as the circles of care, which are ranked as follows: 1. Self-care, 2. Family support, 3. Friends providing care, 4. Regular services (e.g. hiring a regular cleaning service) and 5. Specialized services, which are often more expensive. For the levels 1 to 4 there is a basic support budget, which enables access to care at low cost (between 0 and 25 euro). For specialized support, there are personal assistance budgets available. This is a big transition. Instead of funding a few big organizations, the government now finances many people.
Roy Sainsbury, Academic Network of European Disability Experts (ANED) then shared some statistics, about poverty-risks in various EU countries, about the level of benefits and the level of “generosity” versus “effectiveness in poverty reduction”.

Then Rodolfo Cattani, President of the European Disability Forum (EDF) also shared some statistics, which showed that persons with disabilities are generally 1,5 times more disadvantaged (poverty, discrimination, unemployment) than their nondisabled peers. What is needed is a structured dialogue with DPOs. The term disability “benefits” is not based in the human rights based approach, and neither is the reference to “generosity” by the previous speaker.

Radek Maly, Head of Unit Modernisation of social protection systems, European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, spoke about the EU Pillar of Social Rights, which is mainly focussed on employment and the labour market, with the aim to “change the social reality for persons with disabilities”.
But I wasn’t happy with the fact that the social rights were narrowed down to employment, - and in my opinion, the title of the tool is wrong (it is more like a EU pillar on work and income).

After a little bit of time for questions and answers, the work forum reached its final session, the closing remarks, and then around 17.00 the meeting ended.

It had been quite an interesting day, although there was very little attention for the rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities.
I was happy to hear about the upcoming Dutch CRPD ratification, and also with the invitation for email-communication with Helga Stevens.

Reageer op dit reisverslag

Je kunt nu ook Smileys gebruiken. Via de toolbar, toetsenbord of door eerst : te typen en dan een woord bijvoorbeeld :smiley


rondreizen en ontdekken hoe mensen met psychiatrische problemen overal (over)leven en kijken waarmee we elkaar kunnen helpen.

Actief sinds 21 Dec. 2006
Verslag gelezen: 905
Totaal aantal bezoekers 695089

Voorgaande reizen:

05 Juni 2019 - 06 Juni 2019

Council of Europe - Bioethics Ctee 6 June 2019

12 Mei 2019 - 13 Mei 2019

EC Work Forum on UN CRPD implementation 2019

08 Oktober 2018 - 10 Oktober 2018

Global Ministerial Mental Health Summit

20 Juni 2018 - 24 Juni 2018

Trieste congres June 2018

10 Juni 2018 - 15 Juni 2018

COSP CRPD 2018 New York

28 Mei 2018 - 29 Mei 2018

EC Work Forum on UN CRPD implementation 2018

25 Mei 2018 - 28 Mei 2018

EDF General Assembly 2018 Vilnius

02 Maart 2018 - 04 Maart 2018

EDF Board meeting Brussels 2018

23 September 1994 - 16 Februari 2018

seeking access to justice in NL

05 Februari 2018 - 15 Februari 2018

5th Global Mental Health Summit, SA 2018

06 Oktober 2017 - 09 Oktober 2017

EDF Board meeting in Tallinn

11 Juni 2017 - 25 Juni 2017

COSP NY and Summerschool Galway

06 Juni 2017 - 07 Juni 2017

Council of Europe - Bioethics Committee meeting

18 Mei 2017 - 19 Mei 2017

European Commission Workforum on UN CRPD

11 Mei 2017 - 14 Mei 2017

EDF General Assembly 2017 Madrid

10 Maart 2017 - 14 Maart 2017

WHOCC conference on coercion - Paris 2017

17 Februari 2017 - 19 Februari 2017

EDF Board meeting 2017 Malta

24 November 2016 - 30 November 2016

INTAR India 2016

13 November 2016 - 16 November 2016

ENUSP Empowerment Seminar Berlin 2016

12 Oktober 2016 - 15 Oktober 2016

Expert meeting on the Right to Mental Health

26 September 2016 - 26 September 2016

Personal meeting with MEP Helga Stevens

14 September 2016 - 16 September 2016

5th European Conference on Mental Health

09 Augustus 2016 - 11 Augustus 2016

visit to Lister and ENIK Recovery College

22 Juni 2016 - 24 Juni 2016

NUI Galway Summer School Int. Disability Law

12 Juni 2016 - 18 Juni 2016

Conference of State Parties UN CRPD

09 Juni 2016 - 10 Juni 2016

EC Workforum on CRPD implementation

20 Mei 2016 - 22 Mei 2016

EDF Annual General Assembly 2016 in Dublin

17 Mei 2016 - 17 Mei 2016

EESC Hearing on CRPD Concluding Observations to EU

09 April 2016 - 12 April 2016

WNUSP taskforce meeting and CRPD Committee

11 Maart 2016 - 13 Maart 2016

EDF board meeting Amsterdam 11-13 March 2016

13 December 2015 - 15 December 2015

ENUSP Empowerment Seminar 2015 Brussels

26 Oktober 2015 - 01 November 2015

Meetings in Brussels and Paris

26 Augustus 2015 - 29 Augustus 2015

EU review at 14th CRPD session in Geneva

15 Juli 2015 - 30 Juli 2015

Human rights work in Japan

01 Juni 2015 - 02 Juni 2015

EASPD Hearing at European Parliament

29 Mei 2015 - 31 Mei 2015

EDF General Assembly 2015 Warsaw

28 April 2015 - 29 April 2015

European Commission Work Forum CRPD implementation

29 Maart 2015 - 02 April 2015

UN CRPD Committee - 13th session

11 December 2014 - 14 December 2014

ENUSP General Assembly Hillerod 2014

14 Juli 2014 - 17 Juli 2014

Human Rights Committee 111 session July 2014

29 Maart 2014 - 05 April 2014

UN CRPD Committee sessions April 2014

09 Maart 2014 - 15 Maart 2014

HRC in Geneva and FGC in Zagreb

29 Januari 2014 - 01 Februari 2014

Empowerment Congress at WHO Europe CC

08 December 2013 - 11 December 2013

ENUSP Empowerment Seminar 2013 Bucharest

28 November 2013 - 01 December 2013

Starting FGC in Moldova - user/survivor initiative

29 Oktober 2013 - 02 November 2013

European Network for Family Group Conferencing

15 Juli 2013 - 20 Juli 2013

Conference of State Parties - New York 2013

12 Mei 2013 - 18 Mei 2013

CAT review of the Netherlands 2013

10 Maart 2013 - 15 Maart 2013

Rights into Action - training in Moldova

12 December 2012 - 16 December 2012

Expert meeting on torture- Washington DC

13 November 2012 - 14 November 2012

ENUSP MHE-Mapping Exclusion at European Parliament

05 November 2012 - 08 November 2012

London 5-8 November 2012

19 Oktober 2012 - 21 Oktober 2012

ENUSP Empowerment seminar in Zagreb

15 Juli 2012 - 28 Juli 2012

MDAC Summerschool 2012

12 Juni 2012 - 12 Juni 2012

ENUSP at EU Social Platform of NGO's

10 Mei 2012 - 11 Mei 2012

CAT session on Czech Republic - UN Geneva

14 December 2011 - 17 December 2011

OHCHR regional consultation on torture

11 Oktober 2011 - 01 November 2011

Zuid Afrika 2011

14 April 2010 - 18 April 2010

Praag - Building Bridges- Horatio

19 Oktober 2009 - 25 Oktober 2009

Congres in Stockholm

15 Maart 2009 - 30 Maart 2009

Oost Afrika 2009

29 Mei 2007 - 01 Juni 2007

WHO in Geneve, Zwitserland

03 Mei 2007 - 08 Mei 2007

Madrid - documentaire opnemen

07 Januari 2007 - 08 Februari 2007

Oost Afrika 2007

Landen bezocht: